Emergency Medicine Cardiac Research and Education Group




ACTION Registry
ACTION Registry®–GWTG™ is a national, risk-adjusted, outcomes-based quality improvement program that helps participating facilities measure and improve care for high-risk ACS patients with STEMI and NSTEMI. The result of the collaboration between the two leading national coronary artery disease registries, the NCDR® ACTION Registry® and the American Heart Association (AHA) Get With The GuidelinesSM-CAD Registry, ACTION Registry–GWTG will be the largest, most comprehensive national cardiovascular patient database ever developed by the medical profession.

Combining the strengths of the two programs, ACTION Registry–GWTG will collect a comprehensive set of data elements that provide healthcare professionals and their facilities with the information they need to monitor and improve adherence to the most current, science-based ACC/AHA treatment guidelines. Participation will greatly facilitate quality improvement efforts, optimize clinical care, and improve clinical outcomes for acute coronary syndrome patients.

Visit How To Join to request additional information or to download an enrollment package. Or, visit the ACTION website for more information.



Prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (TRITON-TIMI 38): double-blind, randomized controlled trial



Lancet 2009; 373:723-31 View citation

Background: Mechanical reperfusion with stenting for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is supported by dual antiplatelet treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel. Prasugrel, a potent and rapid-acting thienopyridine, is a potential alternative to clopidogrel. We aimed to assess prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI.

Methods: We undertook a double-blind, randomised controlled trial in 707 sites in 30 countries. 3534 participants presenting with STEMI were randomly assigned by interactive voice response system either prasugrel (60 mg loading, 10 mg maintenance [n=1769]) or clopidogrel (300 mg loading, 75 mg maintenance [n=1765]) and were unaware of the allocation. The primary endpoint was cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke. Efficacy analyses were by intention to treat. Follow-up was to 15 months, with secondary analyses at 30 days. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00097591.

Findings: At 30 days, 115 (6·5%) individuals assigned prasugrel had met the primary endpoint compared with 166 (9·5%) allocated clopidogrel (hazard ratio 0·68 [95% CI 0·54—0·87]; p=0·0017). This effect continued to 15 months (174 [10·0%] vs 216 [12·4%]; 0·79 [0·65—0·97]; p=0·0221). The key secondary endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or urgent target vessel revascularisation was also significantly reduced with prasugrel at 30 days (0·75 [0·59—0·96]; p=0·0205) and 15 months (0·79 [0·65—0·97]; p=0·0250), as was stent thrombosis. Treatments did not differ with respect to thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major bleeding unrelated to coronary-artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery at 30 days (p=0·3359) and 15 months (p=0·6451). TIMI life-threatening bleeding and TIMI major or minor bleeding were also similar with the two treatments, and only TIMI major bleeding after CABG surgery was significantly increased with prasugrel (p=0·0033).

Interpretation: In patients with STEMI undergoing PCI, prasugrel is more effective than clopidogrel for prevention of ischaemic events, without an apparent excess in bleeding.





Legal information

EMCREG™ - International
4555 Lake Forest Drive
Suite 650
Cincinnati, Ohio 45242

Fell free to contact us toll-free at 1-866-4EMCREG (436-2734)





Advanced Search

2 September 2010
27 August 2010
18 August 2010
9 August 2010
2 August 2010
27 July 2010
19 July 2010
19 July 2010
21 June 2010
18 June 2010
11 June 2010
8 June 2010
8 June 2010
NEWS ARCHIVES:
©Copyright EMCREG-International™. All rights reserved