Emergency Medicine Cardiac Research and Education Group




ACTION Registry
ACTION Registry®–GWTG™ is a national, risk-adjusted, outcomes-based quality improvement program that helps participating facilities measure and improve care for high-risk ACS patients with STEMI and NSTEMI. The result of the collaboration between the two leading national coronary artery disease registries, the NCDR® ACTION Registry® and the American Heart Association (AHA) Get With The GuidelinesSM-CAD Registry, ACTION Registry–GWTG will be the largest, most comprehensive national cardiovascular patient database ever developed by the medical profession.

Combining the strengths of the two programs, ACTION Registry–GWTG will collect a comprehensive set of data elements that provide healthcare professionals and their facilities with the information they need to monitor and improve adherence to the most current, science-based ACC/AHA treatment guidelines. Participation will greatly facilitate quality improvement efforts, optimize clinical care, and improve clinical outcomes for acute coronary syndrome patients.

Visit How To Join to request additional information or to download an enrollment package. Or, visit the ACTION website for more information.



Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Preprocedural Cardiac Troponin Elevation Among Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results From the Evaluation of Drug Eluting Stents and Ischemic Events Registry



Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1692-1698 View citation

Background: Patient medical records are important means of communication among health care providers. Limited evaluation has been performed of the quality of the medical records or its association with health care processes or outcomes.

Methods: We performed an empirical evaluation of the completeness of medical records from 607 randomly selected patients admitted with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS) to 219 US hospitals in the CRUSADE National Quality Improvement Initiative. Composite medical records scores were summated and compared by hospital academic status and physician specialty. Correlations between medical records scores, use of evidence-based medicine (EBM), and in-hospital mortality were assessed.

Results: Medical records were frequently missing key elements, including cardiac history (23.6%), performance status (64.6%), differential diagnosis (57.8%), and planned use of EBM (44.0%). Evidence-based medicine was more often discussed in medical records from academic medical centers vs nonacademic medical centers (69.7% vs 51.7%) (P.001) and from cardiologists vs noncardiologists (60.5% vs 48.1%, P=.003). Higher medical records quality scores were associated with greater use of EBM among the medical records quality cohort (P=.006), and a similar trend was observed in CRUSADE overall: adjusted odds ratio, 1.26 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.72) for high vs low medical records quality. Higher medical records quality scores were associated with lower in-hospital mortality: adjusted odds ratio, 0.79 (95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.97).

Conclusions: Medical records for patients with NSTE ACS often lack key elements of the history and physical examination. Patients treated at hospitals with better medical records quality have significantly lower mortality and may receive more EBM. The relationship between better medical charting and better medical care could lead to new ways to monitor and improve the quality of medical care.





Legal information

EMCREG™ - International
4555 Lake Forest Drive
Suite 650
Cincinnati, Ohio 45242

Fell free to contact us toll-free at 1-866-4EMCREG (436-2734)





Advanced Search

2 September 2010
27 August 2010
18 August 2010
9 August 2010
2 August 2010
27 July 2010
19 July 2010
19 July 2010
21 June 2010
18 June 2010
11 June 2010
8 June 2010
8 June 2010
NEWS ARCHIVES:
©Copyright EMCREG-International™. All rights reserved