Emergency Medicine Cardiac Research and Education Group




ACTION Registry
ACTION Registry®–GWTG™ is a national, risk-adjusted, outcomes-based quality improvement program that helps participating facilities measure and improve care for high-risk ACS patients with STEMI and NSTEMI. The result of the collaboration between the two leading national coronary artery disease registries, the NCDR® ACTION Registry® and the American Heart Association (AHA) Get With The GuidelinesSM-CAD Registry, ACTION Registry–GWTG will be the largest, most comprehensive national cardiovascular patient database ever developed by the medical profession.

Combining the strengths of the two programs, ACTION Registry–GWTG will collect a comprehensive set of data elements that provide healthcare professionals and their facilities with the information they need to monitor and improve adherence to the most current, science-based ACC/AHA treatment guidelines. Participation will greatly facilitate quality improvement efforts, optimize clinical care, and improve clinical outcomes for acute coronary syndrome patients.

Visit How To Join to request additional information or to download an enrollment package. Or, visit the ACTION website for more information.



Improving the diagnosis of acute heart failure using a validated prediction model.



J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54:1515-1521 View citation

Objectives: We sought to derive and validate a prediction model by using N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and clinical variables to improve the diagnosis of acute heart failure (AHF).

BACKGROUND: The optimal way of using natriuretic peptides to enhance the diagnosis of AHF remains uncertain.

METHODS: Physician estimates of probability of AHF in 500 patients treated in the emergency department from the multicenter IMPROVE CHF (Improved Management of Patients With Congestive Heart Failure) trial recruited between December 2004 and December 2005 were classified into low (0% to 20%), intermediate (21% to 79%), or high (80% to 100%) probability for AHF and then compared with the blinded adjudicated AHF diagnosis. Likelihood ratios were calculated and multiple logistic regression incorporated covariates into an AHF prediction model that was validated internally by the use of bootstrapping and externally by applying the model to another 573 patients from the separate PRIDE (N-Terminal Pro-BNP Investigation of Dyspnea in the Emergency Department) study of the use of NT-proBNP in patients with dyspnea.

RESULTS: Likelihood ratios for AHF with NT-proBNP were 0.11 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06 to 0.19) for cut-point values <300 pg/ml; increasing to 3.43 (95% CI: 2.34 to 5.03) for values 2,700 to 8,099 pg/ml, and 12.80 (95% CI: 5.21 to 31.45) for values > or =8,100 pg/ml. Variables used to predict AHF were age, pre-test probability, and log NT-proBNP. When applied to the external data by use of its adjudicated final diagnosis as the gold standard, the model appropriately reclassified 44% of patients by intermediate clinical probability to either low or high probability of AHF with negligible (<2%) inappropriate redirection.

CONCLUSIONS: A diagnostic prediction model for AHF that incorporates both clinical assessment and NT-proBNP has been derived and validated and has excellent diagnostic accuracy, especially in cases with indeterminate likelihood for AHF





Legal information

EMCREG™ - International
4555 Lake Forest Drive
Suite 650
Cincinnati, Ohio 45242

Fell free to contact us toll-free at 1-866-4EMCREG (436-2734)





Advanced Search

2 September 2010
27 August 2010
18 August 2010
9 August 2010
2 August 2010
27 July 2010
19 July 2010
19 July 2010
21 June 2010
18 June 2010
11 June 2010
8 June 2010
8 June 2010
NEWS ARCHIVES:
©Copyright EMCREG-International™. All rights reserved